Medical Image Analysis
AI analyzes medical images to detect, classify, segment, and quantify findings for clinical use.
Business impact
- Accuracy — One skin-lesion system reported 86% overall accuracy.
- Sensitivity — One skin-lesion system reported 88% sensitivity for melanoma and 92% for basal cell carcinoma.
- Correlation with pathologist scoring — Ki67 image-analysis scores correlated with pathologists at r=0.95, and r=0.98 for lymph node scoring.
- Response time — One dermatology deployment processed studies in under one second.
Data requirements
- Medical images (image) — X-rays, microscopy images, histopathology slides, dermatology images, MRI, CT, ultrasound, and mammography are all represented in the evidence.
- Clinical data (tabular) — One skin-lesion system combined images with clinical data.
- Pathologist scores (tabular) — Used as comparison data for automated Ki67 assessment.
- Annotated datasets (image) — Training and evaluation used labeled medical image datasets and specific histopathology datasets.
AI methods and techniques
- Image classification — Assigns images or regions to disease or tissue categories.
- Segmentation — Separates cells, tissues, or structures for measurement.
- Detection/localization — Finds abnormalities or suspicious regions in scans.
- Quantification — Produces measurements and scores from image data.
- Deep learning — Used across the image-analysis systems described for medical imaging tasks.
AI models and model families
CNN, Graph Transformers, CLAM, neural network
Industries
Real-world evidence
8 documented case studies on record.
Companies using this: SimonMed Imaging, Center for Label-free Imaging and Multiscale Biophotonics, Sant Joan d'Alacant University Hospital, Sartorius, MobiDev, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto campus, University of Cologne, Cerba Research.
View the full profile with evidence, implementation detail, and comparison tools
Explore full use case →
Explore full use case →