Talent Sourcing and Candidate Screening
AI helps recruiters source candidates, pre-screen applicants, and prepare shortlists and interviews for open roles.
Business impact
- Time to first interview — Danone reported time from vacancy opening to first interview was 80% less.
- Time-to-hire — Expedia Group reported total time-to-hire improved from 80 to 50 days.
- Recruiter efficiency — Expedia Group reported recruiter efficiency when InMailing candidates sourced by Hiring Assistant increased 79%.
- InMail acceptance rate — Expedia Group reported InMail acceptance rate increased from 40% to 56%.
- Candidates recruited — Danone reported candidates recruited were 5x more.
- Candidates hired after the first interview — Danone reported candidates hired after the first interview were 150% more.
Data requirements
- Job applications (text) — Used to assess applicants against listed qualifications.
- Job descriptions (text) — Used to compare role requirements and research comparable roles or talent pools.
- Candidate interview responses (text) — Used in the text-based interview deployment to build candidate profiles and shortlists.
AI methods and techniques
- Candidate scoring — Used to rank applicants against recruiter-defined or posting-defined criteria.
- Pre-screening — Used to filter applicants before a human recruiter advances them.
- Candidate matching — Used to surface people who fit a role or talent pool.
- Automated candidate communication — Used to handle early outreach in the recruitment workflow.
- Interview scheduling — Used to coordinate interviews after screening.
Industries
Real-world evidence
6 documented case studies on record.
Companies using this: Danone, Expedia, Mastercard, Oracle, Starbucks, UJET.
View the full profile with evidence, implementation detail, and comparison tools
Explore full use case →
Explore full use case →