Visual Inspection
Visual inspection systems check parts, assemblies, or finished vehicles from photos or video to find defects and confirm that installed components match what the line expects.
Business impact
- Inspection time saved per aircraft — Boeing reports more than 17 hours saved per aircraft.
- Individual inspections performed — Ford reports 150 million individual inspections.
- Quality issues flagged — Ford reports 400,000 quality issues flagged.
- Specifications verified simultaneously — Renault reports more than 40 specifications verified at once.
- Inspections per vehicle — Stellantis reports 100 inspections per vehicle.
- Inspections per day — Stellantis reports more than 50,000 inspections per day.
Data requirements
- Images (image) — Used to inspect parts, assemblies, paint, welds, and fasteners.
- Video (video) — Used in the Airbus proof-of-concept and in line-side inspection setups.
- Inspector photographs (image) — Used in Boeing’s part-validation workflow.
AI methods and techniques
- Computer vision — Used to analyze photos or video of assemblies, parts, or vehicles for defects and configuration checks.
- Deep learning — Used in the Airbus proof-of-concept to recognize completed assembly steps.
- Machine learning — Used in Ford, Renault, and Volkswagen-related descriptions to support defect or configuration detection.
- Optical character recognition — Used by Boeing to extract part information from inspector photographs.
Industries
Real-world evidence
11 documented case studies on record.
Companies using this: Airbus, Boeing, Ford, GE Aerospace, GM, Northrop Grumman, Renault, Stellantis, Volkswagen, U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Procter & Gamble.
View the full profile with evidence, implementation detail, and comparison tools
Explore full use case →
Explore full use case →